Why should L 15,24(1) not generate a warning? The base register is 0. If you're 
trying to address 24 bytes into a structure, L 15,24(,1) is appropriate.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]] on behalf 
of Janko Kalinic [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Help with EZASMI assembly

L 15,24(0) would generate a warning when FLAG(PAGE0) is an option.  L
15,24(1) should not.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:21 AM Paul Gilmartin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2021-01-21, at 19:59:19, Gary Weinhold wrote:
> >
> > There was an assembler warning (and it was considered "bad form" if a
> > programmer used the same construction).
> >
> Why "bad form"?  Superstition?  Fashion?  Legibility of dumps?
> And "was" (twice) rather than "is"?
>
> > On 2021-01-21 9:35 p.m., Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> >> On 2021-01-21, at 19:07:36, Gary Weinhold wrote:
> >>> ... the GET still has a "L  15,24(1)".
>
> -- gil
>

Reply via email to