On 2021-01-21, at 19:59:19, Gary Weinhold wrote: > > There was an assembler warning (and it was considered "bad form" if a > programmer used the same construction). > Why "bad form"? Superstition? Fashion? Legibility of dumps? And "was" (twice) rather than "is"?
> On 2021-01-21 9:35 p.m., Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> On 2021-01-21, at 19:07:36, Gary Weinhold wrote: >>> ... the GET still has a "L 15,24(1)". -- gil
