Nothing wrong with it, but is it necessary? This is how the ASSP Deluxe thing started and it ended with a shake down of Graziano for cash.
If one used ASSP Deluxe or ASSP X, BOTH products use beta software without letting the user know that it is beta or where it came from. Fritz apparentlt only has a problem with one of them. Charles Marcus wrote: > David, on 7/28/2007 2:06 PM, said the following: > >> You mean someone is using free software within the scope of the license >> with which it is released? It's not open to anyone's "amazing >> interpretation" of the GPL, Fritz. ASSP is free open-source software >> licensed under the GPL, clear and simple. >> >> But it's ok to use your "private builds" as long as you get a piece of >> the action? ASSP Deluxe for cPanel is using your private beta (it's on >> 1.3.4(14) currently) and the WHM interface makes no note that it is beta >> or that it came from your private stash. But ASSP Deluxe is giving you >> portion of the sales and ASSP X is not. >> > > Ummm... David, thats not how I read Fritzs message. > > I don't see anything wrong with him warning people that someone is using > PRIVATE BETA BUILDS, WITHOUT TELLING THEM IT IS BETA SOFTWARE... > > Beta software, by definition, is riskier to use than 'STABLE' software, no? > > So whats wrong with warning someone about this? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
