Julian Sulatycki wrote: > The idea of extensions at home has also been very popular at my office > ever since I introduced the idea. I have tried using the iax soft phones > but people simply do not enjoy talking into a computer. > Given how complicated it is to deal with nat on sip remote extensions, > why are there not hundreds of iax hard phones available?
What exactly is so hard about SIP and NAT connections, you either use an outbound proxy (which can get round multiple NATs btw), or you simply setup STUN. -- Best regards, Duane http://www.freeauth.org - Enterprise Two Factor Authentication http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
