On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Taug'ers
>
> Has anyone had success with the Cisco SPA112 device, or is it just me?
>
> As far as I'm concerned - the Cisco SPA112 is a complete lemon, stay far
> far away!
>


Hi,

I installed one for a client that had a local PBX. My initial response was
that it was fantastic. The quick setup took a few seconds, cordless phone
set worked flawlessly and I've heard 0 complaints in the past 3 months.
I then bought one for myself, when I moved to a new Bell-free house.

The first SPA-122 was dead after 3 days, no tone, no dhcp, nothing.

The replacement SPA-112 never worked over NAT. I received incoming audio,
but no outbound audio ever made it out, (Yes, this is the reverse of a
typical NAT issue). Debugging is nearly impossible since the debug option
didn't record any logs.

I gave up and slapped PIAF on a Dell server I had floating around and
registered it there and it's been working ok for 3 weeks

I'll never buy another one again, that's for sure.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a ATA adapter that works nicely?

Chad

Reply via email to