i have been using former linksys PAP-2 for several years, now Cisco SPA3102 ( i think) with no problem. also, i have been using Grandstream HT702 recently as well, so far no issues.
Yajie On 2012-08-08, at 4:09 PM, Wai Vii wrote: > Best thing to do with it is stick it under the tires of your SUV. > Unfortunately, I've nothing better to suggest off the top of my head > at the moment. > > On 8/8/12, Chad Osmond <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey Taug'ers >>> >>> Has anyone had success with the Cisco SPA112 device, or is it just me? >>> >>> As far as I'm concerned - the Cisco SPA112 is a complete lemon, stay far >>> far away! >>> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I installed one for a client that had a local PBX. My initial response was >> that it was fantastic. The quick setup took a few seconds, cordless phone >> set worked flawlessly and I've heard 0 complaints in the past 3 months. >> I then bought one for myself, when I moved to a new Bell-free house. >> >> The first SPA-122 was dead after 3 days, no tone, no dhcp, nothing. >> >> The replacement SPA-112 never worked over NAT. I received incoming audio, >> but no outbound audio ever made it out, (Yes, this is the reverse of a >> typical NAT issue). Debugging is nearly impossible since the debug option >> didn't record any logs. >> >> I gave up and slapped PIAF on a Dell server I had floating around and >> registered it there and it's been working ok for 3 weeks >> >> I'll never buy another one again, that's for sure. >> Does anyone have a recommendation for a ATA adapter that works nicely? >> >> Chad >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
