On 2008-02-01 20:55, Brian wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> > Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> > > Put the ISSN into a tag: URI instead of using the urn:issn:
> > > scheme.
> >
> > What good would that do?
>
> Does the identifier urn:issn:1234-567 uniquely identify a publication
> or an entry? It can't identify both, because then it is not a unique
> identifier.
>
> > urn:issn:1234-567X#2008-01
>
> What part of the publication with urn:issn:1234-567 does "2008-01"
> apply to? The first letter of the 2008th word, perhaps?
No. I use this on the feed, and not entries.
<feed …>
<id>urn:issn:1234-567X</id>
<entry>
<id>urn:uuid:example</id>
</entry>
</feed>
The question was regarding archive feeds. Should these use the same ID as
the main feed (issn), or should I append an archive date range as a
second identifier (issn#date)?
--
Daniel Aleksandersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
