On 2008-02-01 20:55, you wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> > Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> > > Put the ISSN into a tag: URI instead of using the urn:issn:
> > > scheme.
> >
> > What good would that do?
>
> Does the identifier urn:issn:1234-567 uniquely identify a publication
> or an entry? It can't identify both, because then it is not a unique
> identifier.
>
> > urn:issn:1234-567X#2008-01
>
> What part of the publication with urn:issn:1234-567 does "2008-01"
> apply to? The first letter of the 2008th word, perhaps?
It is supposed to identify the date. This is no standard! But the #part
would solve my problem with keeping my ISSN in all feeds, but still have
the ID be unique. I will try to explain with examples.
Here is /latest-entries.atom:
<feed …>
<id>urn:issn:1234-567X</id>
<entry>
<id>urn:uuid:123456789X</id>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>urn:uuid:X987654321</id>
</entry>
</feed>
Here is /archive-2008-01.atom (January 2008):
<feed …xmlns:fh=…>
<id>urn:issn:1234-567X#2008-01</id>
<fh:archive/>
<entry>
<id>urn:uuid:123456789X</id>
</entry>
<entry>
<id>urn:uuid:X987654321</id>
</entry>
</feed>
--
Daniel Aleksandersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Open Source Notebook - http://opensourcenotebook.com/
