On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 09:31 -0700, Tim Bray wrote: > > I'm getting increasingly grumpy and "just fail" is looking better and > better.
> So for now, I'm -1 on an weakening or removing "The element's content > MUST be an IRI" or analogous text in any other section. I'll stop > shouting if I'm in a small minority here. It's clean, except I'd like an informative statement for people failing and wondering why. And something in the schema that lets people know why, since we can validate against the schema and *pass*? Now that could be confusing. regards DaveP
