On 8/5/05, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The siutation didn't just happen to be vague, we made it vague, I don't > agree it doesn't matter, and if the Atom spec can't get it's story > straight on whitespace to the extent one of the editors is going to > advise people to ignore a MUST directive
To be clear, I would not go shouting this opinion from the rooftops. > that one of the chairs and > others believes has strong consensus support from the WG, then I firmly > believe that puts detailed information on whitespace on the table. Paul, Tim, and I have all proposed text. All of them communicate the reality, and they would all do the job. Graham +1ed Sam's idea, but there was no spec text there. Mnot has pointed out we should write something, because of the BCP, so let's just write something, like now. Robert Sayre Robert Sayre
