Tim Bray wrote: > > I'm getting increasingly grumpy and "just fail" is looking better and > better. The current normative text, "The element's content MUST be an > IRI", is clear and simple and supported by other well-understood > normative text, supported by lots of interoperable software, that make > the meanings of "element", "content", and "IRI" not really open to > intelligent dispute. I claim that text enjoyed strong, not rough, > consensus support from the WG.
I believe that the term "content" is open to intelligent dispute. Apparently the authors of RFC3470/BCP70 believe so too. I won't dispute your read on the consensus of the working group, but I would like to request that *SOME* language be present in the spec that makes this clear. - Sam Ruby
