I don't have any concrete suggestions, but I would suggest Idris as an example to follow. Haskell syntax is relatively popular and concise, and Idris' is even more refined.
I will say I'd prefer syntax that eases functional programming, but that might just be me. And I think that replacing -<lincloptr1> with something more concise like -o would be a good decision either way. On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 12:15:22 PM UTC-6, gmhwxi wrote: > > For the moment, I just want to open a thread for ATS3. > > I decided to pick ATS/Xanadu for the full project name. I like the name > Xanadu > because it is poetic and brings a feel of exoticness. > > ATS3 is supposed to be compiled to ATS2. At least at the beginning. I will > try to > write more about what I have in mind regarding ATS3. > > I know that a lot of people have been complaining about the syntax of > ATS2. So > we can start the effort of designing some "nice" syntax for ATS3. Please > feel free > to post here if you would like share your opinions and ideas. > > I will be happy to take the lead but we definitely need to have some form > of community > effort on this project given its size and scope. > > Cheers! > > --Hongwei > > PS: I felt rushed every time up to now when implementing ATS. This time I > am hoping > to have the luxury of thinking about implementation a bit before actually > doing it :) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/b16a4ee6-8243-4fb6-9e05-e47697ef328b%40googlegroups.com.
