Re: How big of a deal are 32-bit builds?
@5, exactly. NVAccess's refusal excuse was because they would need to rewrite the bit bridge to compensate for 64->32-bit transitions and vice-versa (I don't think this is technically necessary since it sounds like the bit bridge already does this). They also cited the excuse of "portability". I get the idea of portability, I really do; but your not getting complete portability unless you start compiling for 64-bit and 32-bit simultaneously (which is its own hell). I just do not support 32-bit at all, and I will refuse to compile anything for 32-bit these days because 32-bit does not provide any kind of advantage other than total portability. (There was this wiki post I saw a month or so ago that discussed what the Linux kernel had to go through just to emulate i386 support. I can't seem to find it any more though...)
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
