Re: I have a big problem with Twitter. Any alternatives?
I did not say any of that. I did not say we should not fact check, or that we should let politicians break the rules with impunity before taking action. In fact, the whole reason I posted Trump's last two tweets was because I had heard that those in particular were the tweets that got him banned.
I cannot agree with anything Chris says about martial law or any of that, but it does seem that the constitution might be in danger from both the GOP and the dems.
I had not heard anything about the extremists on Parler or their lax stance on extremism. My policy would be that if you post extremist and/or violent or abusive content of any kind, then you should be suspended for a time. Repeating offenders would be suspended for a longer amount of time, and then permanent banning will be used as a last resort if people can't get it through their heads that we support free speech, but there has to be a line drawn somewhere.
Maybe I should've done more research before posting this, particularly in the matter of Parler and the former president's tweets. I do, however, stand for free speech, and while I understand Twitter's motives of trying to prevent violence, I cannot support them.
Maybe that makes me ignorant. Maybe that makes me something entirely different.
Like I said in my first post. You agree with twitter's decision? You think Trump was trying to encourage his more extremist supporters to cause further violence? You think the constitution is in danger, or not? That's perfectly fine, but I personally cannot support either Trump or Twitter.
Maybe I just proved my own point, that wherever politics are discussed, supporters of both parties, or no party, will start some sort of argument in order to prove that they're right.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
