seanadams Wrote: 
> SB1 uses a linear reg for all the 3v3 stuff. I would not bother trying
> to hot rod the digital side of SB1 though
Thanks, I was under the impression that the SB2 used this chip too, I'm
glad hear it's not :) Can you tell what's used in the SB2?

Mark.Bennett Wrote: 
> 
> > playback paused:  *55 ps*
> > playing AIFF:     *57 ps*
> > playing FLAC:     *57 ps*
> > playing mp3:      *58 ps*
> > 
> The evidence seem to indicate that the impact on the jitter
> of playing FLAC vs AIFF is insignificant.
Be careful with this conclusion. Jitter is not a number, it's a complex
spectrum over a wide frequency range that's constantly modulated in a
patterns that have an influence on what we hear. The modulations that
correlate to the music signal (in the audioband) seem to sound more
unpleasant. It's likely that with FLAC decoding the noise patterns
correlate slightly more to the music.

Different noise patterns in the jitter spectrum give a different sound.
F.i. with a normal CD-player there's a slight difference in the jitter
spectrum between repeat on and repeat off.
Even professional studio equipment like the Apogee Big Ben Master Clock
suffers from these problems. It's jitter pattern changes when you change
settings that shouldn't be related. This was discovered because someone
heard a difference after a setting was changed on another output!


-- 
void
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to