P Floding;143188 Wrote: > No need to diss everything audiophile just because one doesn't agree > with some of the BS directed at audiophiles.
Did I diss everything audiophile? I explained the correct usage of transparency as I understand from the world of physics, optics and other sciences. I commented on noise floors masking detail, someone else said that transparency meant the same thing. In my vocabulary, it doesn't, that's all. I try to be very specific to prevent misunderstandings. What you call transparency, I call accuracy because what we're talking about is a more exact presentation of the recording. I'm going to sign off this discussion now, I object to being presented as an extremist and having people invent things that I'm supposed to have said. -- CardinalFang You're only young once, but you can be immature forever... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CardinalFang's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=962 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28080 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
