CardinalFang;143193 Wrote: > Did I diss everything audiophile? I explained the correct usage of > transparency as I understand from the world of physics, optics and > other sciences, including audio. I commented on noise floors masking > detail, someone else said that transparency meant the same thing. In my > vocabulary, it doesn't, that's all. I try to be very specific to prevent > misunderstandings. What you call transparency, I call accuracy because > what we're talking about is a more exact presentation of the > recording. > > I'm going to sign off this discussion now, I object to being presented > as an extremist and having people invent things that I'm supposed to > have said.
There is no need to go defensive just because I explain that transparency has a specific meaning in audiophile lingo, just as it has a slightly varying meanings in other specialised fields. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28080 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
