P Floding;177982 Wrote: > It may convince you, but it wouldn't convince a sceptic. So the effort > is only meaningful to you. I'm acting the sceptic here to point out all > things that may invalidate the test.
Certainly I understand that this was not a scientific test. I guess part of my reason for bringing it up is to see to what extent people feel scientific tests are a "must". When I hear comments such as "people might have heard others raising their hand" (making them feel compelled to do so themselves), I kind of think that's just as reasonable as the idea that people actually hear a difference of a tweak in an A/B comparison. Which is more probable? (and btw - I was a HUGE skeptic of this particular tweak...it was produced by a company that I was a dealer for, and the claims were so foreign and outlandish to me that I dropped them from my product lineup. The tweak we used in this particular test was an updated version of that tweak, and the explanation offered as to how it works is still something I don't believe) > First thing I would do is make the sign that a change has occurred much > more subtle. Good suggestion... -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32466 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
