PhilNYC;177997 Wrote: > Certainly I understand that this was not a scientific test. I guess > part of my reason for bringing it up is to see to what extent people > feel scientific tests are a "must". When I hear comments such as > "people might have heard others raising their hand" (making them feel > compelled to do so themselves), I kind of think that's just as > reasonable as the idea that people actually hear a difference of a > tweak in an A/B comparison. Which is more probable? > > (and btw - I was a HUGE skeptic of this particular tweak...it was > produced by a company that I was a dealer for, and the claims were so > foreign and outlandish to me that I dropped them from my product > lineup. The tweak we used in this particular test was an updated > version of that tweak, and the explanation offered as to how it works > is still something I don't believe) > > > > Good suggestion...
If you PM me about the tweak, I'll see if I can come up with some real-world reasons it might alter the sound of the system! Remember: Even an outlandish explanation can be attached to something simple that actually affects things! (Most explanations in the tweak-industry seem to be utter hogwash..) -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32466 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
