opaqueice;373594 Wrote: > You need to sit down and think this through - you're very confused about > it. > > If the coffee was better from Caffefile 50% of the time and the same > 50% of the time, and the audience picked randomly when it was the same > (as they would have to since it was the same!) and always choose the > Caffefile when it was better, the results would be 50%/2 + 50% = 75% > Caffefile, and 50%/2 = 25% CafMart. > > If the Caffefile was better 1% of the time, the audience would pick > Caffefile 50.5% of the time, and CafMart 49.5% of the time. With > enough trials, even that could be distinguished from 50-50. > > Does that help? You need to sit down and think this through - you're very confused about it.
So, lets say the following: 50% of the time the coffee is the same. 50% of the time it is not the same, but half of this time (25% of total), the CafMart makes a better coffee. The audience identifies with 100% confidence the Caffefile different samples. So ? We have 200 correct samples identified. Does that help ? :) -- Themis SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56712 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
