Hi All, ok,in this little pool only me and maybe 2 others could eard any difference between FLAC and WAVE, all the others could not and experts insure Us is impossible for many obvious and good reason.
So, I've to conclude is probably in my Brain (...but what "is" out of it?) and my next question is force me to follow reason and keep listening in Flac or not? Whel, I don't know, I'll keep on trying and in the meantime I'll enjoy some old LP (just to remember what good sound is). One think is sure, FLAC is far better than WAV for tagging purpose, and also is better (to me) becouse you could store (and TAG) track by track, not so friendly with WAV (Foobar could not produce a .CUE for a single track file, maybe some other. Handling a big collection of classical music is not an easy job, using WAV and CUE could early demotivate you. Is that enougth to give up, not sure... I've got ca. 3500 CD Ripped and stored in FLAC till now, they take 1 TB + backup (1 TB), maybe I'll get a 2TB HD for Kristmas, make a new copy in WAV and Keep Flac files for Back Up. Thanks, Merry Christmas and Happy new Years to Everybody. Marco. -- marcoc1712 ____________________________________________________________ SB+, Klimo Merlino + Kent Gold, Monitor Audio Studio 20 Gold SE+, Klimo reference and DIS Interconnect. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ marcoc1712's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34842 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71321 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
