Audio Bling;683088 Wrote: > Nice post. Well set out & easy to read. Could be a model for others (at > least in form).. > > Bottom line: The jury is still out on this matter and there is reason > to be sceptical - not withstanding your excellent post which seems, > however, a little too one-sided for my taste. For me, your last line > carries the most weight for the following reason: In the absence of > credible testing/experiment, what can we do but share our own meagre > and limited experiences? *Your BJC experience makes you want to line up > for "longer is better"; my experience makes me want to line up for "not > sure". Others here want to line up for no difference*.
Thanks :) (Got the info from a forum-member in Norway) Actually, my experience is the same as yours, not shure. I did read about this before I tried, and what to expect, so did I hear a difference or did my biased brain tell me what to hear....? But the BJCs don't cost a lot of money so it's ok. The 6feet cable sounds calmer and less "fuzzy" than the 3 feet, IMO. Tried the 6 feet BJC vs a 3 feet Stereovox XV2, and I prefer the BJC. Regards Rolf -- NoRoDa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NoRoDa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
