jh901 wrote: > Robert Harley a clown? Ok. > > And yes, asynchronous USB is better than S/PDIF and has become popular > (for good reason). Why buy a first class outboard DAC if its clock is > not able to slave the source component? The digital outputs on the > Transporter, for example, will not allow the DAC to use its' master > clock. DACs do have input receivers and buffers, etc, in order to > reduce the jitter, but it is not as good as asynchronous USB. > > Is this an audiophile forum?
Complete and utter nonsense - the jitter from non-asynchronous USB is the problem and that has absolutely nothing to do with S/PDIF. There is nothing about asynchronous USB that makes it sound better than S/PDIF. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97489 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
