ralphpnj wrote: > Again you have things a little mixed up - there is nothing wrong with > the Transporter's master clock. Besides I already agreed with you that > asynchronous USB is superior to non-asynchronous USB.
The Transporter's clock is vastly inferior to those found in today's best DACs. Vastly. Anyhow, is asynchronous USB superior to S/PDIF? In any way? I've pointed out that slaving the Transporter, for example, to a master is not possible. If the Transporter had asynchronous outputs then it would be desirable to use the USB inputs on many uber-DACs on the market today. Mr. Harley is a much better source of advice than anyone on this forum, btw. He literally wrote the book on hi-end audio. http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Guide-High-End-Acoustic-Engineering/dp/0978649311/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1354912394&sr=1-1&keywords=robert+harley ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97489 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
