callesoroe wrote: > My only evidence is that the data of the original music file has been > dramatic reduced, and that is very audible in my setup. And I am NOT a > cable freak og > anything like that. The differences is just so big, that I can not > understand if anyone should have problems telling what is what. > There must be something wrong in the setups.... > > That said. A very well recorded track can sound better as a MP3/320 > file, than a bad recorded track as a FLAC file. > But if you listen to the well recorded track, the FLAC version will be > much better than the MP3. If your system can > not reveal that, then there is definitely something wrong in the setup.
? What do you mean "well recorded" or "bad recorded" track? Are you talking about the source itself (ie. different remasters?) or bad ripping of the same CD? I understand your assertion/belief in the first paragraph (whether it's empirically true is another issue), but your second paragraph was unclear... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98374 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
