Archimago wrote: > ? What do you mean "well recorded" or "bad recorded" track? Are you > talking about the source itself (ie. different remasters?) or bad > ripping of the same CD? > > I understand your assertion/belief in the first paragraph (whether it's > empirically true is another issue), but your second paragraph was > unclear...
What I meant was that you need to have good source material to reveal the differences. A bad recording compressed and mastered to death in the studio, then I agree it is difficult to hear the difference(if any). But when the source material is great, the you will certanly hear it. I did not mean anything like bad rips or so. I just operate with accurate rips. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ callesoroe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22693 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98374 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
