Gandhi wrote: > This discussion is so far completely void of hard > facts.__It_would_be_helpful_if_someone,_*anyone*,_would_measure_the_device,_*any_measurement_at_all*,_and_then_*publish_*it._ > That way this would turn into a discussion based on (at least some) > facts. We could then stepwise take it further with possibly other > measurements. No, this is exactly the issue - appropriate measurements are > informed by the theory of operation of the device - that's why I called bullshit on Archi's 8KHz suggested measurement. You can't just go off, half-cocked, measuring whatever takes your fancy - it's not science, it's not objective, it shows nothing of worth & proves nothing!!
> But please remember that the burden of proof, from a purely logical > standpoint, is on the *manufacturer*. The manufacturer is the one making > claims. So the logical step would be for the manufacturer to measure and > publish. Well, the manufacturer is working on measurements, I believe but there is another way to evaluate a device - listen to it :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
