Apesbrain wrote: > We're only human... > > > > ...and we're all "audiophiles". Some of us draw a line at the > "pseudo-sciency" stuff and others don't. If you've happy with your > decisions, what does it matter? > > > Agreed, but when I see mention of a "high end... Discrete R2R ladder > DAC" I feel that 48kHz is not going to be enough for that person and > this "limitation" might be relevant.
I think the truth matters in this post truth society we live in today :/ it's not a flavour you can pick IMO . Science denial is a big problem , modern audiophilism is a small insignifanct fringe of that but a part of a trend ,I think all kinds of pseudo science is very dangerous and do hurt societies in the end . People's decisions impact others and the world around us. Discrete DAC :) LoL , what's next tube CPU ? Oh yes the mythology that noise shaping delta sigma DAC is bad for you , bring back the good old nonlinear DAC's, but where almost out of old Philips DAC's ? Why not the worst of two worlds ancient design combined with tech never intended for this ? Is not DAC a prime example of what's best done on a chip ? -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106537 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
