arnyk wrote: > Why did you bring up acclimatization to dialect when the discussion was > about acclimatization to quality of audio reproduction?
Because I see the brains ability to discern speech as a separate cognitive function from acclimatisation to audio reproduction, so wanted you to explain why you brought up articles about the former to lend support to a discussion on the latter. > > I think it was your usual malevolence towards science. another pointless barb. > > I take it that the instructional piece about experimental design was way > over your head. It's application to your situation is that one would > try to make dialect acclimatization factors irrelevant in any experiment > that tried to study acclimatization to different kinds or degrees of > flawed reproduction.[\quote] > > This was so bleeding obvious without having to read anything else that I > see no point in mentioning it further and as a result it becomes just > yet another patronising attempt to belittle. > > > > > > > IOW, if there are dialect problems, you repeat the experiment series > > several times so that dialect acclimatization averages out, or better > > still you use talkers and listeners that are pre-acclimatized, that is > > are familiar with or native users of any of the dialects that are > > involved. > > > > > > Duh, obviously. -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k albums.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
