drmatt wrote: > Because I see the brains ability to discern speech as a separate > cognitive function from acclimatisation to audio reproduction, so wanted > you to explain why you brought up articles about the former to lend > support to a discussion on the latter. >
You can visualize whatever erroneous and imaginary facts as you wish, Dr Matt, and I can choose not to follow them down the rabbit holes of your choosing. It is well known that sound can be too soft, too loud, too distorted, too high in pitch, too low in pitch, and too contaminated with noises and interfering signals to be recognized as anything but some random kind of noise. In those cases there is no useful cognition of any even slightly detailed intellectual or emotional information that might be transmitted. IOW, for most practical purposes, there is no useful cognition. The sound has to have some degree of technical purity to be recognized in any useful way. However it is known and I think has even been reported on this thread that acclimatization to some kinds of technical problems can help with recognition of sounds. Now you can deny those facts at the risk of proving my evaluation of your knowledge to be more correct than not. > > another pointless barb. > "Drmatt" It is true that attempting to stimulate you brain into thinking more clearly by inducing anger is rendered pointless by your apparent basic incapacitates related to thinking at all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
