Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess. Hector On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P <[email protected]> wrote: > Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1]. > There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2] > and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively. > So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed > accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just > python-jinja2? > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870 > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651 > > > -- > (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile > (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. > (> <) come join the dark side. > /_|_\ (we have cookies.) >
-- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: [email protected] Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253
