I don't know if the renaming patch was applied to AUR and if it's possible to just rename the packages or they have to be deleted and be uploaded again though. Let a TU tell us.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess. > Hector > > On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1]. >> There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2] >> and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively. >> So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed >> accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just >> python-jinja2? >> >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497 >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870 >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651 >> >> >> -- >> (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile >> (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. >> (> <) come join the dark side. >> /_|_\ (we have cookies.) >> > > > > -- > Hector Martínez-Seara Monné > mail: [email protected] > Tel: +34656271145 > Tel: +358442709253 > -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
