Hi, I opened the mentioned bug and I still think the same way. Let's hope the changes will be conducted any time soon with all python packages. The current policy is in my opinion the correct for a roll up distribution as archlinux. python-* -> python3 python2-* -> old python 2 version
Hector On 19 June 2011 19:57, Ray Rashif <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 June 2011 21:09, Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think the solution is to be *very* consistent with packages names >> whatever the situation of the python3 version is right now. >> In other words: pick a guideline and stick to it. If >> python2-X/python-X is the way to go, no matter there is a python3 >> package or not, use this convention... > > Correct. However, with a previous discussion [1] and a bug report [2] > lingering I think most of us are hesitant to make a move. Maybe we're > just hoping for someone to step up with a mighty roar and set the > record straight. > > [1] > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-April/019958.html > [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23139 > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10 > -- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: [email protected] Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253
