On 19 June 2011 21:09, Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the solution is to be *very* consistent with packages names > whatever the situation of the python3 version is right now. > In other words: pick a guideline and stick to it. If > python2-X/python-X is the way to go, no matter there is a python3 > package or not, use this convention...
Correct. However, with a previous discussion [1] and a bug report [2] lingering I think most of us are hesitant to make any moves. Maybe we're just hoping for someone to step up with a mighty roar and set the record straight. -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
