On 06/19/2011 11:11 AM, Axilleas P wrote:
I don't know if the renaming patch was applied to AUR and if it's
possible to just rename the packages or they have to be deleted and be
uploaded again though. Let a TU tell us.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess.
Hector
On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P<[email protected]> wrote:
Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1].
There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2]
and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively.
So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed
accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just
python-jinja2?
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
(> <) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
--
Hector Martínez-Seara Monné
mail: [email protected]
Tel: +34656271145
Tel: +358442709253
We Can't rename packages
--
Jelle van der Waa
