Mike,
Your comment would carry more weight if you were a paid up
member of the GFA.
If you were a member you would be able to propose changes to
BSE and other documents.
If you don't like what GFA do that is not GFAs problem.
Sean
From: Aus-soaring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Borgelt
Sent: Friday, 15 April 2016 6:45 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] BSE Update now published
At 10:06 PM 4/13/2016, you wrote:
There's an official feedback form so that we can collate and prioritise
changes. I'm happy to take public or private critiques as well, particularly
related to the chapters that I worked on. As always, there will be some
controversial changes and expect to cop some heat, but we have a very fine
line to tread between practicality and lawyers. Sometimes the lawyers won as
this is now considered an official airworthiness engineering manual that
needs to stand up in a court of law.
What you should have done is get a lawyer to write a front page disclaimer
so it CANNOT be used in a court of law. Make it an advisory/educational
publication only.
Mike
Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring
instrumentation since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com <http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/>
tel: 07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 : int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
