Justin, your obviously a doer. You have me in your camp also and hear, hear.

> On 16 Apr 2016, at 9:24 AM, Justin Couch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 16/04/2016 8:19 AM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
> 
>> At present GFA is setting up a system that burdens private citizens with
>> unnecessary work and responsibility and nobody seems to be looking ahead
>> to see if all this will be sustainable in 10 years. It is a potential
>> time bomb for the sport..
> 
> On this, you and I are on the opposite ends of the spectrum. The whole reason 
> I'm getting involved in this is to get the government out of the sport as 
> much as possible. The more we can show that we have our ducks in a row to 
> show we are responsible people (including paying heed to the fact that laws 
> do exist and we must sometimes at least have look like we are obeying them), 
> the less likely we'll have a repeat of a few years ago where we had our 
> entire airworthiness and training system yanked from under us. The subsequent 
> result is having to pay tens of thousands of dollars a year just to maintain 
> our existing fleet - which will drive almost every club into financial ruin 
> and kill the sport completely in this country.
> 
> Our old approach was extremely poor, and others called us on it. Really - we 
> keep all our airworthiness records in some guy's personal garage that then 
> burnt down?! That's beyond amateurish and CASA should take us to task on that 
> because internally nobody bothered. Yearning for "the good ole days" won't 
> make our lives better or give us more freedom.
> 
> Besides, once again, you think "court of law" means The Government coming 
> after us. Very narrow minded there. There's many other ways we can end up in 
> that situation that doesn't involve the government - even if we gave away all 
> our delegations and made CASA look after us completely.
> 
> On the aging community, I do agree there. We have a problem. My club, at 
> least, is doing a lot to address that. Currently I believe about 20% of our 
> membership is under 25. Maybe half of those guys are coming along with me on 
> the airworthiness trek, and I have another half a dozen "older" members (most 
> under 45 too) as well that will be looking to complete their Form 2 training 
> within the next year or so. SXGC has historically been a feeder club to the 
> rest of NSW - most of our members eventually leave and join more cross 
> country-oriented clubs. Considering ours is a club where historically the 
> entire fleet has been maintained by a commercial shop and I've got it to this 
> stage in 3 years, I think we're doing darn well at addressing that concern 
> about the aging community and airworthiness.
> 
> We have a choice: we can either sit back in our rocking chairs on the porch 
> and complain about it, or get off our arses and make sure the rules get bent 
> in a way that works for our benefit rather than having rules imposed on us 
> that we don't like. I'm in the second camp.
> 
> -- 
> Justin Couch                                 http://www.vlc.com.au/
> Java 3D Graphics Information                    http://www.j3d.org/
> LinkedIn                     http://au.linkedin.com/in/justincouch/
> G+                                                       WetMorgoth
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Look through the lens, and the light breaks down into many lights.
> Turn it or move it, and a new set of arrangements appears... is it
> a single light or many lights, lights that one must know how to
> distinguish, recognise and appreciate? Is it one light with many
> frames or one frame for many lights?"      -Subcomandante Marcos
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to