Did you know that the Deed with Casa is between the glider pilot and CASA



> On 4 Feb 2017, at 11:06 pm, Mark Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 4 Feb 2017, at 5:55 PM, Greg Wilson <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> One low cost step toward improving the gliding "product" would be to make 
>> GPC holders responsible for their own flying instead of relying on a L2 
>> instructor's presence at launch.
>> 
>> I can understand how the current system evolved from clubs wanting to 
>> control pilots in their aircraft but surely it's time for this outdated 
>> system to be relinquished.
> 
> It didn't evolve from clubs wanting to control pilots in their aircraft. It 
> evolved from GFA wanting to control club operations.
> 
> GFA implements a chain of command: 
> 
> Pilot -> Duty Instructor -> CFI -> RTO -> CTO -> (CASA, but we're not meant 
> to believe that)
> 
> Each link in the chain is, as previously observed, equivalent to a "rank." 
> Authority flows downwards, with each layer following the command of the layer 
> above. Responsibility flows upwards: The duty instructor is "responsible" for 
> the operation (how? never really defined). The CFI is "responsible" for the 
> panel. And so on. 
> 
> Sitting at the middle of everything is GFA, HQ, setting policy centrally, 
> implemented by the chain of command.
> 
> It's all right there in the MOSP ("standing orders.")
> 
> I speculated earlier that it happened like this in the 1950s because so many 
> of the early GFA people had military aviation involvement, so setting up a 
> command hierarchy would've been a natural way to approach civilian aviation. 
> Society was a lot more hierarchical then too.
> 
> It isn't anymore.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Enough discussion here may even start movement in that direction from GFA. 
>> What do you think?
>> 
> 
> Can't be here. GFA started their own website forums for members specifically 
> so they wouldn't need to listen to this one.
> 
> Members need to get upset about this. Get organised.
> 
>      - mark
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to