Dave

Get a V10 Toureg, save the planet, save aluminium from not needing 2 extra 
pistons, and feel good about yourself ..... all at the same time.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Boulter-Internode 
  To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 1:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Climate change.


  Thinking of buying a V12 Turbo Diesel F100 Truck to tow the new motor
  glider, that should help!

  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring-
  >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Loxton
  >> Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2007 10:57 AM
  >> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  >> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Climate change.
  >> 
  >> The argument on weather climate change is real or not is irrelevant.
  >> we have no way to know for sure, and really arguing about it  is just
  >> wasting time we may not have. We DO have control over our actions and
  >> weather or not we choose to do something about it. At the end of the
  >> day there are 4 possible outcomes to this whole debate:
  >> 
  >> 1) we act, it was not real. we waist time and money, hit a moderate
  >> recession, have some good new tech, but we survive in more or less our
  >> current form and live on.
  >> 2) we act, it WAS real, similar to 1 above, but we averted disaster
  >> 3) we dont act, it was not real - yippee for us, we got lucky
  >> (although since fossil fuels are finite in quantity, more likely to be
  >> as above )
  >> 4) we dont act, it WAS real - say even the conservative estimates
  >> eventuate, billions of people die, billions more are short of food and
  >> water, world economies fall, sea levels rise, drouts, floods, mass
  >> extension, world wars, remnants of superpowers fighting over dwindling
  >> land and resources.  etc. - life will go on, humans will probably
  >> survive, but it would be a very different world.....
  >> 
  >> so since we cant know for sure weather climate change is real or not,
  >> not 100%, the only argument worth having is weather or not to act on
  >> the possibility. in the end it is an exercise in risk management.
  >> given the enormous consequence on not acting, and Climate change
  >> turning out to be real (4 above) then the ONLY sensible choice is to
  >> ACT!!!!!!
  >> 
  >> the only thing we can know for sure is that over the next century
  >> there will be some very big changes in the world, and in the way we
  >> all live. It is up to all of us to make these transitions as smooth as
  >> possible. Understand the problems, look at the risks, for god sake
  >> open your eyes, pull your head out of the sand and make the RIGHT
  >> choice.
  >> 
  >> NOW CAN WE GET BACK TO GLIDING :-)
  >> 
  >> Cheers,
  >> 
  >> Ben
  >> 
  >> (part of the generation who will see what will happen, and has to
  >> survive in it, please leave us a liveable world)
  >> 
  >> 
  >> On 04/12/2007, at 10:21 AM, Mark Newton wrote:
  >> 
  >> >
  >> > On 04/12/2007, at 9:19 AM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
  >> >
  >> >> Did you actually read the paper?
  >> >
  >> > Absolutely yes.  And you're not the first person to refer me
  >> > to it either.
  >> >
  >> >> There's a very short summary here by David Evans, who used to be a
  >> >> believer and even made his living at it
  >> >> http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Evans-CO2DoesNotCauseGW.pdf
  >> >
  >> > That's nice.  He even cites Monckton, which is lovingly self-
  >> > referential.
  >> >
  >> >> Just look at the data.
  >> >
  >> > Here's the thing, Mike:
  >> >
  >> > Generally speaking, the scientists who are looking at this stuff,
  >> > who are often quite a bit smarter than I am, are "just look[ing]
  >> > at the data."
  >> >
  >> > As absurd as it may sound, some of them are smarter than you too.
  >> > :-)
  >> >
  >> > While challenging each other to "just look at the data," they
  >> > can't agree.  In any group of highly respected climate scientists,
  >> > half of them will be dead wrong, and history will plot out their
  >> > legacy in the same way that it records flogiston and ether.  They're
  >> > all looking at different bits of the data, and they're all coming
  >> > up with frankly absurd computational models to predict climactic
  >> > behaviour.  Until one of them can accurately predict what's going
  >> > to happen more than 5 years ahead, _none_ of them are worth
  >> > listening to.
  >> >
  >> > So here's my take:  Acknowledging that I'm not smart enough to
  >> > be authoritative on this, I'm not drawing conclusions and am
  >> > keeping an open mind.  That is, after all, what's required of
  >> > a skeptical enquirer, right?
  >> >
  >> > Another thing that's required of a skeptical enquirer is
  >> > to question sources, and that's what I've done with Monckton.
  >> >
  >> > If _you_ were a proper skeptic, you'd be doing the same, just
  >> > like I'm guessing you do with Mann's hockey stick and the IPCC,
  >> > and comparing sea level rise predictions with observed sea
  >> > levels.  It strikes me that by only criticising the positions
  >> > you disagree with, you've probably formed some conclusions which
  >> > the science is not yet capable of supporting.
  >> >
  >> > Monckton's record paints him as someone who's unbalanced enough to
  >> > carry a taint even without considering the funding he receives
  >> > from the petrochemical industry.  If the science supporting your
  >> > position is anywhere near as strong as you claim it is, you should
  >> > be able to find a better advocate than him.
  >> >
  >> > That is all.  Carry on.
  >> >
  >> >   - mark
  >> >
  >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
  >> > I tried an internal modem,                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >> >      but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
  >> > ----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
  >> >
  >> >
  >> > _______________________________________________
  >> > Aus-soaring mailing list
  >> > [email protected]
  >> > To check or change subscription details, visit:
  >> > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> Aus-soaring mailing list
  >> [email protected]
  >> To check or change subscription details, visit:
  >> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
  _______________________________________________
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  [email protected]
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to