>From 200 feet you could get half a loop in....
JR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] 180 degree turns - teardrop


> Agree Terry.
>
> Mike Valentine would have said 'This type of maneuver should always be
> watched from a safe distance'
>
>
>
>
>
> Terry Neumann wrote:
> > Texler, Michael wrote:
> >> To throw the cat amongst the pigeons.
> >>
> > Thanks Michael,  This pigeon admits to being quite alarmed by some
> > aspects of these papers =-O .
> >> Here are some links with attached research, regarding the best way to
do a 180 (if required).
> >> Any comments or disagreements?
> >>
> >> OK, if people want to poo-poo this, please provide a rational and
reasoned explanation why (i.e. use a scientific and objective argument).
> > I certainly won't poo-poo it, because I'm not strong on scientific and
> > reasoned discussions with professors who are clearly expert in their
> > field.  As Mike says ".....They did the  math.".   Therefore as an
> > exercise on paper it is quite credible.
> >
> > Unfortunately however, math or not, the history is that a lot of
> > people who have attempted this option died in so doing.   This
> > suggests that  whatever the math might say, it's a helluva risky
> > manoeuvre which frequently fails to work out as the theory
> > suggests.    The concept might be plausible, even convincing, but this
> > is no consolation if you are in the wreckage, or perhaps worse, if you
> > are one of those who is put in the dreadful position of being the
> > second or third person on the scene of the accident.  (The first
> > person BTW is the pilot - the second may be the instructor who was
> > demonstrating the exercise).
> >
> > The difference between theory and practise is often much greater than
> > the theory would suggest.  IMHO this one such situation.
> >
> > As for turnbacks at 200 ft?  Not if I'm around thank you!  Especially
> > if I'm on the inside of the aircraft.
> >
> > The other problem with a theoretical approach to a situation like this
> > is that it might indeed be achievable with an above average pilot, but
> > a pilot with lesser ability (or experience - probably both) sees it
> > done once effectively by the club hotshot, programs himself to
> > consider the same option if it happens to him, but when it does, he is
> > 50 feet lower, 5 knots slower in speed, about the same number of
> > seconds behind what the aircraft is thinking, and a tad excessive with
> > the rudder.......    You can guess the rest.
> >
> > It's usually much easier and quicker to derig the aircraft in the next
> > paddock than to have to pick up all the pieces on the airfield.
> > That's still how I would prefer to approach an event like this.   I'm
> > not sure if this is sufficiently rational or reasoned, but wreckage on
> > the ground has a way of re-evaluating theoretical argument - often
> > very dramatically.
> >
> > Terry
> > (With apologies for possibly excessive cynicism, but pigeons can be
> > like that if the cat is significant ....)
> >
> >
> >> http://www.nar-associates.com/technical-flying/impossible/possible.html
> >>
> >> http://jeremy.zawodny.com/flying/turnback.pdf
> >>
> >> "Conclusions A simplified model of the turnback maneuver after engine
failure during the take-off climb segment has been developed. The model
shows that optimum conditions for returning to the departure runway result
from climbing at Vmax , executing a gliding turn through a 190-220deg
heading change, using a 45deg bank angle at 5% above the stall velocity in
the turn using a teardrop shaped flight path."
> >>
> >> P.S. Thanks to Daryl McKay for providing these links.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Aus-soaring mailing list
> >> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> >> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> >> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aus-soaring mailing list
> > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> > To check or change subscription details, visit:
> > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to