On 23/08/2010 1:13 PM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
---------------

The ultralight argument is interesting. It probably isn't co-incidence that the Ultralight guys got recognition in 1983 and the peak GFA membership was in 1984-85. This tells me that many people who were flying gliders merely wanted to FLY as against SOAR. As ultralights are so much more convenient to operate I can see why they went to ultralights. However a pool of 10,000 trained sport aviation pilots should be regarded as an opportunity because some of them will get bored with simply flying around the paddock or going over to the next airfield for coffee. The GFA will need to get over itself though in its operating philosophy or these people will take one look and never be seen again. The gliders on offer had better be modern, high performance and preferably self launching too. At least self retrieving. This wasn't the case at Renmark so we haven't run that experiment. -------------------
Sounds like a reasonable theory. True the Renmark situation doesn't fit that model. I'd be interested in any comments from Adelaide Soaring Club about how many ultralight pilots convert to soaring there? I believe they have 3 Jabiru's training and a DG1000 among a nice (to me) list of sailplanes.
Kym Z.
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to