You probably have hit the nail on the head, all without mention of OFITTH's

I believe there are parallels with snow sports:
Skiing is a dying sport -  there are too many barriers in the way of
becoming a good skier, as it needs a lot of time and money invested in
lessons. Not many people are prepared to do that, and it shows.

That's why snowboarding is growing: no need for a lesson, just hire a board
and get a mate to show you the basics, and you can be hooning out of control
down the slope with your mates in no time at all. 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DMcD
Sent: Friday, 27 August 2010 10:49 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] *SPAM* RE: Death of a Movement

>>There is nothing in our system that provides them with a structured
path for development beyond the circuit. No cross country, no
competitions. There is nothing to engage the interest of the able
individual looking for intellectual and physical challenge, looking to
develop their skills, looking to have fun. Predictably these people,
who represent the priceless potential for the future, go elsewhere.

This seems to be a bit of a blinkered discussion. Guess it would not
be the Aus-soaring group without that.

If you are a young person wanting to go gliding rather than power
flying, you have three choices. PG, HG and sailplanes. HG is in a
similar position to sailplanes. static or falling membership. PG is
growing well. Why is that?

Why not think of reasons why, apart from the fact that there are a lot
of other young people flying paragliders, that kids would prefer to do
this version of gliding rather than fly sailplanes?

It's not the money. it's probably cheaper to train to fly sailplanes
than it is to fly HG or PG.

Perhaps it is precisely because the approach is casual and
unstructured (just like most young people,) that it appeals to  young
people. Perhaps, if you are at school or have just left, the idea of
another seemingly endless session of learning would be a big turn-off.

The GPC is well-meaning but it simply extends what is already a very
long period of training compared with the few minutes you might spend
pre-solo in a paraglider or a hang glider.

There's no real concept of "independent operator" in these alternative
versions of gliding. Nothing that says that when you go solo, you
can't decide where and when you fly and where you land. No daily check
flights when you turn up at the club. No annual flight review with
it's dubious safety checks. And once you have gone solo and got the
relevant rating, you can fly anywhere in the world.

>>Show what is possible after plodding through the 'effects of
controls'...gliding IS different!

In fact, you can demonstrate this quite easily to an HG or PG pilot on
a good day. The performance and general ease of flying a sailplane and
the ease of going cross country is a big selling point to anyone who
has already flown another type of glider, but to do this you need to
do more than a 30 minute local soaring flight at some outer suburban
site.

I don't think for a moment that gliding is dead. There are just more
forms of it now and more choices. What can we do to make our version
more attractive than the others? And more attractive to young fliers?

D

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3096 - Release Date: 08/27/10
04:34:00

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to