Rolf, in this I agree with Mike - there is no way that a duplicate control check (or even DI) would have found the problem. Sadly, such a person would have spent months in court defending themselves, costing them many thousands with no prospect of any insurance helping them.
In practice, the UK do have a 2nd inspection - just with no signature. The accident report even says this was done ! Is it the check that improves safety or the signature ???? On 16/05/2011, at 13:35 , rolf a. buelter wrote: > Yea, way more important to cover your ass against litigation then document a > second chance to get it right! > > Allays your miserable Mr. Buelter > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:54:25 +1000 > > To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > > From: mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com > > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Foka incident > > > > > > Lots of lessons in the Foka crash. > > > > One big one is how fortunate it was the BGA and there was no second > > sigmnature on the DI after rigging. > > > > Mike > > Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments since > > 1978 > > phone Int'l + 61 746 355784 > > fax Int'l + 61 746 358796 > > cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784 > > > > email: mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com > > website: www.borgeltinstruments.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aus-soaring mailing list > > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > > To check or change subscription details, visit: > > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > To check or change subscription details, visit: > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
