Ian,

How did they score the pilots who finished at the distance but below the minimum height? If you are going to have a minimum height for the finish it may as well be 500M over the top (or 1500 feet) of the airfield. Then it conforms with normal aviation practice and when below 1500 you are no longer racing. No low energy finishes etc. The people who get back with less than 1500 feet are allowed to join for a straight in or on base etc as long as they tell everyone what is happening. It is to their advantage to finish as high as possible though so they won't be blazing in at Vne. Seems it would be safer and even add some spectator interest to the finish.


I agree the 1000M Vne line was horrible but I don't remember ever having a problem with only one camera clock start point and a FAI sector of 90 degrees centered on the first leg. At least there is only one point where people are busy getting in the right position and the rest of the airspace doesn't have this impediment. I flew one nationals where multiple start points were used with camera clocks. Didn't think much of it. If you want to race you want to fly the SAME task. AAT may be competing in gliders but it isn't racing as the rest of the world knows it.

As for danger, we can play with the rules to try to minimise this but the arguments devolve to somebody "feels" that one way or another is safer. We did have one midair with one bailout and one death where multiple start points were in use. In the end, putting tens of gliders in close proximity for starts, finishes and tasks will dramatically increase the chances of a mid air collision and individuals will need to make their own judgements as the whether the risk is worth it to them. If it isn't don't play.

Mike


At 04:22 PM 15/02/2014, you wrote:

My 20c worth is I think I prefer multiple start points and about half my comp flying was in the the VNE 1000m start line which was bordering on dangerous.

As for finishing I really like the 2 or 3 km circle at say 1000ft. I have been at a German comps years ago and they had well over 100 gliders and all finishes were 3km out at 300 m I seem to remember. They also had a well ordered landing procedures and only one main strip. I was impressed.

I think the last out & return was set in nationals about 1970 and cats cradles continued on for about another 10years., With new tasks being set with haste on the grid this conflicting directions must be thought about & usually is. .

Ian mcphee
On 15/02/2014 3:19 PM, "Mike Borgelt" <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
At 05:46 PM 14/02/2014, you wrote:
I agree completely with Tim. We should all use the same rules worldwide.

So the only other question that needs answering is when is the rest of the world going to change to our well thought out multiple allocated start points and 3km finish circles. And while they are changing their rules, they can mandate that all pilots use low tow as well.

Can you still be World Champion if you declare a Lay day 48 hrs in advance?



And they should all mandate two signatures after rigging. This was actually proposed in the US about 12 years ago after a tragic mishap but no more was heard after someone pointed out that nobody in his or her right mind would sign.

Mike

Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978
<http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/>www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                 :  int<tel:%2B61-42835%205784>+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
<http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring>http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to