This could just be one of those issues that does the rounds every so
often, never getting the analysis it deserves.

Some of the relevant information is relayed and lots of it not each time.
Some of the information is distorted due to to people's memories and
some of it not.

If anyone believes passionately in this subject the only way to resolve
this issue is first of all to collect all the information known about
the subject. Maybe something like the Blanik Spar repository is a good
way to go about it:
https://sites.google.com/site/blanikspar/

How you sort through what information is factual and what is not, and
then get reasoned unemotional debate is another question.

My two cents worth.

Michael Derry


On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 11:29:44 +1030
stephenk <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> And that is what is so annoying about this whole discussion. Only a 
> little factual documentation* exists about the whole issue. Yes, I have 
> seen a number of posts by the person you mentioned but dont recall/cant 
> find one like that. Here's a post from the same person
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.aviation.soaring/JQvuWQYd-9k
> regarding the "rudder dropping off" a Puchacz, with later posters giving 
> a link to an FAA report which purportedly confirms it. Except the link 
> doesn't confirm it, no incident seems to exist in the FAA database now 
> and another poster said they were from the club in question and the 
> source of the story wasn't telling what really happened.
> 
> It's happening in this thread too, Derek said he recalled 26 fatalities 
> from Puchacz spin accidents and Bernard has talked about 26 fatal spin 
> accidents. Meanwhile has anyone ever actually seen the original list 
> which was being discussed in the mid 2000's?
> 
> *And yet another example. Bernard recalls Mike Valentine calling the 
> Puchacz a "widow maker". In my previous reply to Derek I almost made 
> mention of _my_ recollections of what Mike V said. Strangely enough, I 
> was at those instructor seminars which Bernard refers to, as from the 
> late 80's till about 2000 I was CFI of Port Augusta gliding club. I do 
> remember Mike V talking about the Puchacz and calling it an "honest 
> aeroplane". ie in the sense that it behaved in a text book manner, if 
> you mishandled it it would depart into "classic" spin behaviour and 
> because it was heavy it would take a fair bit of space below to recover. 
> Not saying Bernards recollection is entirely wrong either, we might be 
> remembering two different parts of the same elephant.
> 
> Regards
> SWK
> 
> 
> On 28/12/2014 10:41 AM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
> > I've never seen an official NTSB report on it but it was reported on 
> > r.a.s. in a thread on Puch spinning after another Puch spin in elsewhere.
> > IIRC it was Cindy Brickner who posted that information. R.a.s. Is 
> > probably archived somewhere.
> >
> >
> > Note also we've had one near spin in by two level 3 instructors in 
> > W.A., reported here by one of them And a Puch spin in at Narrogin by 
> > an experienced instructor with student from low level thermalling.
> >
> > Maybe all the spin recovery training in the world is simply 
> > ineffective when the aim is to prevent spinning in the first place. 
> > Spinning is not a normal manoeuvre in soaring flight.
> > Spin prevention training doesn't seem to help much either, although 
> > both are a good idea. Simulators may help but we have no information.
> > It seems possible that the real problem is that task prioritisation 
> > has been incorrectly or not taught, including the ability to not get 
> > distracted, focus on just one thing and forget all the others. It only 
> > takes a few seconds.
> > As Alan Rundle once said "flying is easy, you can teach a monkey to 
> > fly an aeroplane. It is the thinking that goes with it that is hard to 
> > teach."
> >
> > Mike
> > On 27 Dec 2014, at 10:05 pm, stephenk <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >> Mike,
> >> you've made this claim before. I assume it is another incident, not 
> >> the Caracole one (because they weren't that high, nor were they ex 
> >> test pilots)
> >> But I've never been able to find any other references to an accident 
> >> like this and the NTSB database only seems to show up 4 Puchacz 
> >> accidents in total
> >>
> >> EventId    InvestigationType       AccidentNumber  EventDate       
> >> Location 
> >> Country    Latitude        Longitude       AirportCode     AirportName 
> >> InjurySeverity     AircraftDamage  AircraftCategory 
> >> RegistrationNumber         Make    Model
> >> 20040730X01116     Accident        LAX04CA270      07/18/2004      Lone 
> >> Pine, CA 
> >> United States      36.588333       -118.051944     O26     Lone Pine       
> >> Non-Fatal 
> >> Substantial        
> >>    N19SZ   PDPS PZL-BIELSKO        SZD-50-3
> >> 20040406X00422     Accident        FTW04LA103      04/04/2004      Cherry 
> >> Valley, AR 
> >> United States      35.370834       -90.750556      
> >>    
> >>    Non-Fatal       Substantial     
> >>    N18SZ   PDPS PZL-Bielsko        SZD-50-3
> >> 20030605X00794     Accident        LAX03LA165      05/26/2003      Minden, 
> >> NV      United 
> >> States     39.000278       -119.750833     MEV     Minden-Tahoe Airport 
> >> Non-Fatal  Substantial     
> >>    N503HC  PZL-Bielsko     SZD-50-3
> >> 20001211X10620     Accident        LAX98FA235      07/17/1998      
> >> CALIFORNIA CITY, 
> >> CA         United States   
> >>    
> >>    
> >>    
> >>    Fatal(2)        Destroyed       
> >>    N7215L  PZL-Bielsko     SZD 50-3
> >>
> >>
> >> Do you have any other references?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> SWK
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27/12/2014 10:22 PM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
> >>> Well one was two USAF test pilot school graduates from at least 3500 
> >>> feet AGL.
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



                   
                        

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to