> I think your paper's example should NOT use abs(), but instead some > other function (whether you merely rename your existing example to > 'myabs', or pick a different function which DOES have well-defined errno > semantics right now), precisely because abs() does NOT currently have > well-defined errno semantics and it is controversial on whether such > semantics should be given to it.
If that's literally the only feedback, then that's no problem to change. Niall
