5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group <austin-group-l@opengroup.org> yazdı:
> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:28:45 -0400 > From: "Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group" < > austin-group-l@opengroup.org> > Message-ID: <1d8c5e6e96fbdd47ce143a566b57db2c803d4898.ca...@gnu.org> > > | do you consider the pseudoterminal as providing to the terminal, or the > | terminal as providing to the pseudoterminal. > > How did anyone ever get to a question like that? - there are a pair of > devices which between them implement a pseudo-terminal (which is just > like a terminal, to the application, but isn't one ... hence > pseudo-terminal). > > Personally I'm quite happy with the existing terminology, and see no > particular need for change (as close to meaningless as the terms are > in this context - they are well established, anything different will > just create confusion). > > Couldn't agree more. I don't understand what problem such a change in the terminology is supposed to solve. > But if a change is really needed, make it a radical change, and make it > reflect what is really happening, don't try and coerce existing words > to somehow pretend to fit. None of the suggestions that have been > made here is really adequate. > > kre > > -- Oğuz
