"O?uz via austin-group-l at The Open Group" <austin-group-l@opengroup.org> 
wrote:

> Sorry for butting in, but according to the standard, is there really a
> syntax error in the following?
> 
> sh -c ': << do | for x in xxx
> do
> do echo $x
> done'
> 
> busybox sh, dash, gwsh, netbsd sh, and freebsd sh complain about a
> missing `done'.

I would call this a bug in these shells.

Jörg

-- 
EMail:jo...@schily.net                  Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
                                        Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/

  • Re: shell: swappi... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: shell: swappi... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: shell: swappi... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: shell: s... G. Branden Robinson via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: shell: s... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: shell: s... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: shell: s... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: shel... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: shel... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: ... Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • ... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • ... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
            • ... Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • ... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: ... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to