8 Eylül 2021 Çarşamba tarihinde Harald van Dijk <a...@gigawatt.nl> yazdı:
> On 08/09/2021 08:15, Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > >> Sorry for butting in, but according to the standard, is there really a >> syntax error in the following? >> >> sh -c ': << do | for x in xxx >> do >> do echo $x >> done' >> >> busybox sh, dash, gwsh, netbsd sh, and freebsd sh complain about a >> missing `done'. >> > > This is not about 'do' as a delimiter, but about a heredoc right after the > items in a for command. This fails too: > > sh -c ': << x | for x in xxx > x > do echo $x > done' Yeah, I didn't test much. Thanks > > It results in an error about a missing 'do'. And this works, but should > not: > > sh -c ': << x | for x in xxx > do echo $x > x > done' > > Only speaking for gwsh, but yes, I consider this is a bug and will make > sure to fix it. What's happening is a missing check for pending heredocs, > causing the heredoc to only start on line 3, rather than on line 2 as it > should. There is nothing that I am aware of in POSIX that allows this. > Cheers, > Harald van Dijk > -- Oğuz
