Rick Barnes wrote: > I considered what I said, and even though I still agree with most of it, > I should have expressed it as simply, "I don't agree with your (major) > edits".
Alright, no worries. This is just an editing disagreement, it doesn't have to be a big deal if we don't want it to be. :-) > I still believe that the "cuts" are unnecessary, however, I am willing > to discuss this matter; and, may concede if others feel your position is > the best for all. But you see, they weren't meant as cuts. I didn't mean to say "delete all these", but rather "put this elsewhere". And I suggested appendices. It's not about the content, it's about the best place to put it. > In the end I want to do the work that is best for the OOo project as a > whole. Yes, no one doubts that. Fortunately we have Jean and Janet here with us. They know what they're doing and they can show us the way. :-) Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org |
